Tags:
tag this topic
create new tag
view all tags
---+ Maximum Record Size _Increase maximum record size to 4GB_ <br />%TOC% ---++ Overview Allow large alpha fields to be defined in the APPX DD (up to 4GB) This change effects... * Permanent disk files (only stored in Oracle initially) * Memory Files * Working Storage files Exceptions... * Consecutive disk files (no initial support for large records) * Temporary disk files (no initial support for large records) * One-Record disk files (no initial support for large records) ---++ Test Plan: ---+++ DD Edit Checks: (untested) *Test Requirements:* Note: Test these with key and non-key fields Does the Data Dictionary Compiler allow a 4G record size for... * Permanent disk files? * Memory Files? * Working Storage files? Does the Data Dictionary Compiler enforce the original 32K limit for... * Consecutive disk files? * Temporary disk files? * One-Record disk files? *Test Results and Notes:* Untested ---+++ Storage and Processing Capabilities: (untested) *Test Requirements:* Note: Perform the following tests for the following... * Permanent Oracle disk files * Memory Files * Working Storage files Note: The following FMS interfaces will not initially support large records... * Appx-IO * DB2 * ODBC * SQL Server * C-ISAM * Vision Does Restructure handle the large record correctly? Does the Oracle interface support large records correctly? Do you get a reasonable error message when attempting a non-supported FMS type? Using a Subroutine process, can you store and retrieve 4G record data? Using an Input process can you store and retrieve 4G record data? Using an Output process can you store and retrieve 4G record data for the following as Text and PDF... Using a Query process can you correctly Sort and Select on 4G record data? Using Child Constraints can you correctly access parent/child data with 4G record data? Does TECHDOC print the record size correctly up to the max of 4G? *Test Results and Notes:* untested ---+++ ILF Statements: (untested) *Test Requirements:* Note: Test ILF statements with 4G group header where a field name is required. Do the following ILF Statements handle 1M alpha fields correctly? * IF / AND / OR - All relational operators * IF DIFF * PASS / RECEIVE * SET * STORE / RESTORE - Record and Field *Test Results and Notes:* untested -- Main.PeteBrower - 2011-03-04
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
Watch
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r2 - 2011-03-04
-
PeteBrower
Home
Site map
Main web
MedicaidBilling web
Sandbox web
TWiki web
Main Web
Users
Groups
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
P
View
Raw View
Print version
Find backlinks
History
More topic actions
Edit
Raw edit
Attach file or image
Edit topic preference settings
Set new parent
More topic actions
Account
Log In
E
dit
A
ttach
Copyright © 2008-2025 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback